[Peakoil] David Holmgren reflects on the 2020 summit

[Mike Hettinger]

The Canberra 2020 Summit (ie the local one) wasn't particularly
interested in Peak Oil -- frustrating.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: peakoil-bounces+mike=mikehettinger.com at act-peakoil.org
[mailto:peakoil-bounces+mike=mikehettinger.com at act-peakoil.org] On
Behalf Of Jenny Goldie
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 5:38 PM
To: Alex Pollard; peakoil at act-peakoil.org
Subject: Re: [Peakoil] David Holmgren reflects on the 2020 summit


It is good to read David Holmgren's views. Whoever designed the terms of

reference for the 2020 Summit clearly didn't have a clue. Just as they
have 
left out Peak Oil, so too they are only considering how to manage
population 
growth rather than curtail it, something very necessary in light of
climate 
change and Peak Oil.

Jenny

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Pollard" <alex-po at trevbus.org>
To: <peakoil at act-peakoil.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 11:05 AM
Subject: [Peakoil] David Holmgren reflects on the 2020 summit


> Permaculture co-founder David Holmgren reflecting on the 2020 summit.
>
> ------------- Forwarded message follows -------------
>
>
> A note from David Holmgren re 20/20
>
> Subject: [Pil-pc-oceania] 2020 Reflections
> To: pil-pc-oceania at lists.permacultureinternational.org
> Message-ID: <p06240805c4260e1bf73a@[192.168.1.101]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Following APC9 there has been much discussion on the listserve about 
> the divergent opportunities for permaculture activism in Australia 
> including comments about the absence of permaculture from the Rudd 
> government's 2020 forum. I did (briefly) consider applying to join the

> 2020 forum but was so disgusted with the way the questions were framed

> (ie assuming continued economic growth, increasing technological 
> complexity etc were inevitable for Australia and the
> world) that I decided that I wouldn't be bothering to apply although I

> can remember thinking I might be convinced if invited (maybe  this is 
> an elitist perspective that doesn't help maximise power and influence 
> but it is one that I use to help filter and limit the escalating 
> demands to something that is personally sustainable.)  My scepticism 
> was reinforced by Michael Lardelli's opinion piece about the absence 
> of Peak Oil from the agenda (reported on Energy Bulletin 
> http://www.energybulletin.net/42630.html ). All the more so that all 
> 10 members of Association for the Study of Peak Oil that applied to be

> at the forum were rejected. As far as I know there is no leading 
> permaculture teacher, designer or activist is at the forum either. 
> Finally any discussion of Peak Oil as a "problem", or Permaculture as 
> a "solution" would be forced down into the "getto" of the 
> Sustainability and Climate Change subject  when Peak Oil (like Climate

> Change) is central to framing the agenda within which all of the other

> questions must be addressed and the second is relevant to designing 
> adaptive strategies in relation to all the questions.
>
> In comparing the absence of ASPO and Permaculture,
> ASPO http://www.aspo-australia.org.au/
>  is a relatively new organisation that has focused a lot on media and 
> public policy (ie predominantly top down information and change) The 
> number and quality of submissions to the Senate inquiry into Future 
> Fuel Security in Australia is an example of ASPO's action. It has 
> contributed to the fact that all Australian politician cannot deny 
> knowing about the evidence for imminent peak oil and the absence of 
> any serious planning. On the other hand ASPO is a small organisation 
> with not much influence or history. Maybe it could easily be ignored 
> by the 2020 gate keepers.
>
> Permaculture is a concept that predates the other sustainability 
> concepts, is a national and international movement, with tens if not 
> hundreds of thousands of practictioners, teachers, designers and 
> activists on all continents. As a subset of the environment movement 
> it is unusual in being almost completely solution oriented but not 
> focused with mainstream corporate or householder sustainability. Apart

> from Permaculture and related networks, most radical grass roots 
> environmental activism, is oppositional, trying to stop the world we 
> don't wont rather than create the world we do want. On the other hand,

> imagining the perspective of the 2020 gatekeepers, permaculture lacks 
> a coherent voice or a focus on public policy. Even allowing for these 
> limitations, its amazing that permaculture's 30 year track record as a

> positive future focused movement, with a brand identity in Australia 
> that makes it almost a household word, that its not represented at 
> 2020. Perhaps that reflects the baggage and negatives that some people

> associate with permaculture and our own assumption that we are not 
> part of mainstream society and therefore would not bother to be part 
> of it.
>
> Just some thoughts without any particular agenda about what "we" 
> should do other than to say that I feel the new energy behind PIL that

> emerged at APC9 suggests the possibility of an organisation emerging  
> that could speak in some sort of representative way at the national 
> level through position papers, policies and media releases that speak 
> the language of government. It seem odd to me that I came away with 
> more confidence about these possibilities when APC9, for all its 
> fantastic aspects (many thanks to all those involved), did not appear 
> to produce any concrete outcomes, even when and where the next event 
> would be.
>
> Leaving aside the big picture perspective for the personal; I was 
> dobbed in for the local Ballarat 2020 forum in the group considering 
> Australia's Future In The World. I went along out of curiosity and was

> surprised that there were no hard line security or defense 
> perspectives and lots of justice and sustainability perspectives as 
> well as voluntary simplicity and personal change attitudes on these 
> issues. My energy descent future scenarios (see
> http://www.futurescenarios.org/) were received with interest within 
> the group. I came away wondering whether this "Labour Party" event had

> attracted a very limited slice of Australian society or whether the 
> mainstream media just refuse to reflect the concerns, perspectives and

> understandings of Australians that conflict with consensus reality 
> generated from the top via corporations, media and government. 
> Probably a bit of both.
>
> David Holmgren
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peakoil mailing list
> You are subscribed as jgoldie at snowy.net.au 
> http://act-peakoil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/peakoil/jgoldie%40snowy
> .net.au


_______________________________________________
Peakoil mailing list
You are subscribed as mike at mikehettinger.com
http://act-peakoil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/peakoil/mike%40mikehettin
ger.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date:
4/12/2008 11:32 AM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date:
4/12/2008 11:32 AM