<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18999">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><STRONG><FONT size=4>Peak Oil And Population
Decline</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=style1><STRONG>By Peter Goodchild</STRONG></P>
<P class=style1>19 December,
2010<BR><STRONG>Countercurrents.org</STRONG><BR><BR><SPAN
class=style2><STRONG><FONT size=4>A</FONT></STRONG></SPAN> solution that is
sometimes proposed for the dilemma of fossil-fuel decline is a global campaign
for the humane implementation of rapid population decline (RPD). With all due
respect for the attempt to find a satisfying answer to the question of
overpopulation, such a proposal would conflict with the available data on the
rate of decline in fossil fuels. The annual rate of population decline, in a
civilization in which fossil fuels are the principal source of energy, must
roughly equal that annual rate of fossil-fuel decline, which is probably about 6
percent (Höök, Hirsch, & Aleklett, 2009, June).</P>
<P class=style1>Unfortunately there is no practical humane means of imposing a
similar 6 percent annual rate of decline on the world’s population. If we let
Nature, i.e. loss of petroleum, take its course, a decline of 6 percent would
result in a drop in world population to half its present level, i.e. to 3.5
billion, by about the year 2020, a mere decade from now. The only means,
however, would be a rather grim one: famine.</P>
<P class=style1>On the other hand, a deliberate global campaign of RPD, even
with the immediate implementation of an utterly hypothetical fertility rate of
zero (i.e. the implementation of a “zero-child policy”), would be far less
dramatic. The rate of population decline would exactly equal the death rate.
(This is true by definition: “growth rate” equals “birth rate” minus “death
rate”, and we have already said “birth rate” is zero.) The present death rate is
about 1 percent (CIA, 2010). At that rate, the global population in the year
2020 would still be about 6.3 billion. There would therefore be no means for
such a program of RPD to work before the effects of fossil-fuel depletion took
their own toll.</P>
<P class=style1>(Such figures for an RPD program, of course, disregard any other
possible catastrophic future events such as famine [the above-mentioned means
that is in fact likely to prevail], disease, war, general anarchy, and a
thousand other side-effects of societal breakdown.) </P>
<P class=style1>Incidentally, we can also consider the more long-range effects
of the previously-mentioned depletion in fossil fuels. If we assume that
agriculture is ultimately unsustainable (Diamond, 1987, May; Ferguson, 2003,
July/August; Lee, 1968), then we must regard a population of 1 million, as
existed in 10,000 BCE, as ideal. To be generous, however, let us choose 10
million as a final stabilized population. With an annual decline in fossil fuels
of 6 percent, a final drop to that relatively feasible population of 10 million
will be in about the year 2110.</P>
<P class=style1>A global campaign for RPD may be regarded as one form of the
soft-landing scenario. If we must reject such an RPD campaign and soft landings
in general, the following three points might constitute a basic statement of
global systemic collapse:</P>
<P class=style1>1. Modern industrial civilization is based on fossil fuels; we
have been burning 30 billion barrels of oil a year. Fossil fuels provide our
manufacturing, transportation, agriculture, mining, and electricity. The main
problem is peak oil: the world’s supply of usable, recoverable petroleum is
starting to diminish. The best estimate of the annual rate of decline might be 6
percent, which means production will drop to one half of the peak amount around
2020. There is a common belief that “alternative energy” can replace fossil
fuels; the quest for alternative energy, however, has been going on for decades
with no very practical results, mainly because of the barrier of insufficient
“energy return on energy invested”.</P>
<P class=style1>2. Fossil fuels are not the only foundation of modern industrial
civilization. Of roughly equal importance are metals and electricity. This triad
is synergistic: if one of the three should fail, then so do the other two.
Fossil fuels are in decline, but metals are also becoming less plentiful.
Electricity will be in decline worldwide because it is produced mainly with
fossil fuels.</P>
<P class=style1>3. Peak oil basically means peak food. Without mechanization,
irrigation, and synthetic fertilizer, crop yields drop considerably, and famine
is inevitable. Over the next few decades, the survivors will be those who have
mastered the art of subsistence farming. Ultimately, however, it may be that the
Paleolithic practice of foraging, with a greatly reduced population, is the only
way of life that can be extended for millennia. </P>
<P class=style1>The first two of those three points, however, are really a case
of going over ground that has been covered many times in the past. What I have
stated above about the necessity for a smaller population has certainly also
been said, in more or less the same manner, by many others.</P>
<P class=style1>The only point that is worth discussing is number 3, not 1 or 2.
Perhaps it would also be worthwhile to discuss a hypothetical point 4, whatever
that might consist of. On the other hand, there is really nothing to be gained
by further discussion of whether the peak oil date is imminent, for example, or
whether there are untapped sources of alternative energy. The important topics
for further research are solely those related to the survival skills needed by
the population that remains. It is only queries of that sort that are positive
responses to the coming disaster. Putting further effort into questioning the
basic existence of the disaster means wasting time that should be spent in
dealing with matters beyond points 1 and 2.</P>
<P class=style1>The collective unconscious of the year 2010 seems to have been a
mixture of apathy and despair, but such muteness is based on a misunderstanding.
While the rich minority are buying land in Paraguay, the poor majority have
descended into catatonia, yet it is the former who have a clearer vision of the
future. One can only hope that there will be more of a proactive approach, and
that more people will acquire the aforementioned survival skills. Perhaps my
passion for books influences me unduly, but I even suspect that if reading and
writing could be preserved, in the manner of the medieval scriptorium, then some
sort of enlightened primitivism could prevail in the coming ages.</P>
<P class=style1><STRONG>REFERENCES:</STRONG></P>
<P class=style1>CIA. World factbook. (2010). US Government Printing Office.
Retrieved from <A
href="http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook">http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook</A></P>
<P class=style1>Diamond, J. (1987, May). The worst mistake in the history of the
human race. Discover. Retrieved from <A
href="http://www.environment.ens.fr/perso/claessen/agriculture/mistake_jared_diamond.pdf">http://www.environment.ens.fr/perso/claessen/agriculture/mistake_jared_diamond.pdf</A></P>
<P class=style1>Ferguson, R. B. (2003, July/August). The birth of war. Natural
History.</P>
<P class=style1>Höök, M., Hirsch, R., & Aleklett, K. (2009, June). Giant oil
field decline rates and their influence on world oil production. Energy Policy,
(37) 6, 2262-72. Retrieved from <A
href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.020">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.020</A></P>
<P class=style1>Lee, R. B. (1968). What hunters do for a living, or, How to make
out on scarce resources. In R. B. Lee and I. DeVore, Eds., Man the Hunter.
Chicago: Aldine Publishing.</P>
<P class=style1><STRONG>Peter Goodchild </STRONG>is the author of Survival
Skills of the North American Indians, published by Chicago Review Press. His
email address is odonatus {at} live.com.</P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>