<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080 size=2><SPAN class=449180705-27022006>I
know that many of you canvass Energy Bulletin regularly, but in case you miss
it, this is a remarkable overview on (potential) things to come by Michael
Ventura.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080 size=2><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080 size=2><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006>Could actually assist with career and lifestyle
planning!</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080 size=2><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080 size=2><SPAN class=449180705-27022006><A
href="http://www.energybulletin.net/13200.html">http://www.energybulletin.net/13200.html</A> </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=left><SPAN class=594123104-17112004><FONT color=#000000>
<P><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Sandy Pollard</FONT></P><FONT face=Verdana
size=2></FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV align=left><SPAN class=594123104-17112004><FONT color=#000000><FONT>
<P><SPAN class=449180705-27022006></SPAN><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT
color=#000080>P<SPAN class=449180705-27022006>S - After being buoyed by the
knowledge that the Australian Senate has received some good submissions -
slapped in the face by the harsh reality of (Adrian's posting on) the solar ad
being rejected.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P><FONT face=Verdana><FONT
size=2><FONT color=#000080><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV align=left><SPAN class=594123104-17112004><FONT
color=#000000><FONT><FONT><FONT color=#000080><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006></SPAN></FONT>
<P><SPAN class=449180705-27022006></SPAN><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT
color=#000080>W<SPAN class=449180705-27022006>hat grieves me is this: with the
harsh consequences of the 'hydrocarbon twins' (global warming and peak oil) -
the former is the one that the public more readily understands.
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT
color=#000080><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV align=left><SPAN class=594123104-17112004><FONT
color=#000000><FONT><FONT><FONT><FONT color=#000080><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006></SPAN></FONT>
<P><SPAN class=449180705-27022006></SPAN><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT
color=#000080>G<SPAN class=449180705-27022006>iven the political and economic
constraints around the 'selling' of the PO message for politicians (and the
constant misinformation of <EM>'the market - or technology - will provide'</EM>
from the economists etc) global warming is arguably easier to use to sell
arguments or policies for conservation and
restraint.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Verdana><FONT size=2><FONT color=#000080><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006>PPS - Does anyone have a copy of 'The End of
Suburbia' on DVD for loan or
sale? </SPAN></FONT><BR></P></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT><SPAN
class=449180705-27022006><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080 size=2></FONT></SPAN>
<P><SPAN class=449180705-27022006><FONT face=Verdana color=#000080
size=2>--</FONT></SPAN></P></FONT></SPAN></DIV></BODY></HTML>