[Peakoil] Paul Krugman article from NYT

Alex Pollard alex-po at trevbus.org
Sun Jul 29 19:06:58 EST 2007


The Sum of Some Fears
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: July 27, 2007

Yesterday’s scary ride in the markets wasn’t a full-fledged panic. The
interest rate on 10-year U.S. government bonds — a much better indicator
than stock prices of what investors think will happen to the economy — fell
sharply, but even so, it ended the day higher than its level as recently as
mid-May, and well above its levels earlier in the year. This tells us that
investors still consider a recession, which would cause the Fed to cut
interest rates, fairly unlikely.

So it wasn’t the sum of all fears. But it was the sum of some fears — three,
in particular.

The first is fear of bad credit. Back in March, after another market plunge,
I spun a fantasy about how a global financial meltdown could take place:
people would suddenly remember that bad stuff sometimes happens, risk
premiums — the extra return people demand for holding bonds that aren’t
government guaranteed — would soar, and credit would dry up.

Well, some of that happened yesterday. “The risk premium on corporate bonds
soared the most in five years,” reported Bloomberg News. “And debt sales
faltered as investors shunned all but the safest debt.” Mark Zandi of
Moody’s Economy.com said that if another major hedge fund stumbles, “That
could elicit a crisis of confidence and a global shock.”

I saw that one coming. But what’s really striking is how much of the current
angst in the market is over two things that I thought had been obvious for a
long time: the magnitude of the housing slump and the persistence of high
oil prices.

I’ve written a lot about housing over the past couple of years, so let me
just repeat the basics. Back in 2002 and 2003, low interest rates made
buying a house look like a very good deal. As people piled into housing,
however, prices rose — and people began assuming that they would keep on
rising. So the boom fed on itself: borrowers began taking out loans they
couldn’t really afford and lenders began relaxing their standards.

Eventually the bubble had to burst, and when it did it left us with prices
way out of line with reality and a huge overhang of unsold properties. This
in turn has caused a plunge in housing construction and a lot of mortgage
defaults. And the experience of past boom-and-bust cycles in housing tells
us that it should be several years at least before things return to normal.

I’ve written less about oil prices, so let me emphasize two points about the
oil situation. First, we’re now in our third year of very high oil prices by
historical standards — prices as high, even when adjusted for inflation, as
those that prevailed in the early 1980s, after the Islamic revolution in
Iran. Second, unlike the energy crises of the past, this price surge has
happened even though there hasn’t been any major disruption in world oil
supply.

It’s pretty clear what’s happening: economic development is colliding with
geology.

The “peak oil” theorists may or may not be right in asserting that world oil
production is already as high as it will ever go — anyone who really knows
what’s going in Saudi Arabia’s fields, please drop me a line — but finding
new oil is getting a lot harder. Meanwhile, emerging economies, especially
in Asia, are burning ever more oil as they get richer. With demand soaring
and supply growth sluggish at best, high prices are what you get.

So why did people seem so shocked by a few more bad housing and oil numbers?
What I guess I didn’t realize was how deep the denial still runs.

Over the last couple of years a peculiar conviction emerged among some
analysts — mainly, for some reason, among those with right-wing political
leanings — that the housing bubble was a myth and that the real bubble was
in oil prices.

Each new peak in oil prices was met with declarations that it was all
speculation — like the 2005 prediction by Steve Forbes that oil was in a
“huge bubble” and that its price would be down to $35 or $40 a barrel within
a year. And on the other side, as recently as this January, National
Review’s Buzzcharts column declared that we were having a “pop-free” housing
slowdown.

I didn’t think many people believed this stuff, but the market’s sudden
freakout over housing and oil suggests that I was wrong.

Anyway, now reality is settling in. And there’s one more thing worth
mentioning: the economic expansion that began in 2001, while it has been
great for corporate profits, has yet to produce any significant gains for
ordinary working Americans. And now it looks as if it never will.





More information about the Peakoil mailing list