[Peakoil] ISIS report: "Which Energy?"
Keith Thomas
keith at evfit.com
Mon Mar 27 23:00:53 EST 2006
The following are 18 recommendations from the latest report from ISIS
in London (The Institute of Science in Society)
The URL for the full report is:
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/UK-Energy-Vision.php
--------------------------------------------
Keith Thomas
www.evfit.com
--------------------------------------------
1 Nuclear energy should be ruled out on grounds of safety, world
security and economics; also because it is a finite, non-renewable
resource, and it gives energy returns and savings on carbon emissions
no better than gas-fired heat and power co-generation.
2 Energy self-sufficiency is the best guarantee of energy security.
This can be achieved by a diversity of sustainable, renewable energies
at medium-, small- and micro-generation scales, according to resources
locally available, so that energy is used at the point of generation,
saving up to 69 percent of the energy lost through long distance
transport of electricity from big centralised power plants and the
associated carbon emissions.
3 The electricity grid should be restructured for all levels of
embedded local generation that would enable neighbouring communities to
supply electricity to one another in times of need (through electronic
switching devices), thereby maximising stability of electricity supply
throughout the grid. This distributed network is also the best
protection against blackouts and terrorist attacks.
4 Food self-sufficiency should be considered an integral part of
energy self-sufficiency, as it reduces food miles and ecological
footprints, saving on both energy and carbon emissions. Food produced
locally and consumed fresh enhances its quality and nutritional value,
and improves the health of the nation.
5 Organic, low input sustainable farming should be encouraged as an
effective way to reduce fossil-fuel intensive fertiliser and pesticide
inputs and carbon emissions.
6 The renewable options adopted must be sustainable. In the present
context, we define sustainable as being safe for health and
biodiversity, affordable, ethical, energy efficient, as near as
possible to ‘zero-emission' and ‘zero-waste'; and above all, does not
compromise the world's food security.
7 Two energy-from-waste technologies ideally satisfy the criteria for
renewables that are sustainable: producing biogas from organic wastes
(agricultural, municipal and industrial), and using green algae for
capturing carbon dioxide from the exhaust of power plants coupled with
biodiesel production.
8 Solar energy is getting better and more affordable all the time, and
will be an important small- to micro-generation technology especially
suited for Third World countries lacking energy infrastructure.
9 The production of biodiesel from waste cooking oils and other
industrial food wastes, and diesel from waste plastics that cannot be
easily recycled into plastics should all be considered.
10 We do not support energy crops for biofuels, especially not in poor
Third World countries, unless they can be shown to truly satisfy our
criteria of sustainability. Biofuels from most existing energy crops
give poor to negative energy returns and small savings, if any, on
carbon emissions. They are damaging to the environment and will
accelerate global warming if primary and secondary forests are
converted to energy crop plantations, as they are likely to be in Latin
America. Most of all, they compromise food security in competing for
land with food crops, and can push up the price of food.
11 We do not recommend investing in physical and chemical carbon
capture and storage technologies.
12 We do not support energy intensive extractive technologies as they
merely extend our dependence on fossil fuels and divert scarce
resources away from developing sustainable renewable energy sources.
13 An integrated food and energy self-sufficient farming system should
be widely implemented in developing as well as developed countries, as
a cost effective and sustainable solution to global warming and the
energy crisis.
14 Subsidies and tax incentives should be used to support the
appropriate options, and over a long time scale.
15 Carbon credits should be extended to include small and medium
enterprises engaged in carbon savings, such as the production of biogas
from organic wastes on farms.
16 Special subsidies and grants for research and development should be
earmarked for small to medium enterprises, non-government organisations
and individuals, because these are responsible for most of the
innovations in renewable energies.
17 Legislation to promote savings on energy and carbon emissions
should be put in place and enforced through inspection of buildings,
for example.
18 There is an urgent need to remove bureaucratic hurdles from
individuals, small to medium enterprises, and non-government
organisations setting up innovative, energy and carbon emissions
savings projects.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 5054 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://act-peakoil.org/pipermail/peakoil/attachments/20060327/df768da7/attachment.bin
More information about the Peakoil
mailing list