[Peakoil] Submission so far

David Jorm david.jorm at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 20:52:30 EST 2006


Fantastic job. I have nothing to add, this is a good summary. I noticed a
few linguistic errors though - an edit before submission would be useful.

On 2/24/06, Keith Thomas <keith at evfit.com> wrote:
>
> Great job so far. You might notice my fingerprints in there.
>
> The whole document - in this un-shortened version - should be stored
> for future use.
> --------------------------------------------
> Keith Thomas
> www.evfit.com
> --------------------------------------------
> On 24/02/2006, at 8:15 AM, Alex P wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This is the Senate submission so far. It will need to be taken down
> > once it
> > is submitted later today due to the rules of the inquiry.
> >
> > http://act-peakoil.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?
> > id=senate_oil_inquiry_submission
> >
> > Alex
> > O4O4873828
> >
> > ACT Peak Oil discussion list
> > http://act-peakoil.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Peakoil mailing list
> > You are subscribed as keith at evfit.com
> > http://act-peakoil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/peakoil/
> > keith%40evfit.com
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peakoil mailing list
> You are subscribed as david.jorm at gmail.com
>
> http://act-peakoil.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/peakoil/david.jorm%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://act-peakoil.org/pipermail/peakoil/attachments/20060224/a7dfa8fe/attachment.html


More information about the Peakoil mailing list